Assamese: এই কাৰণে বেলেগ বেলেগ ভাষাৰে কথা কোৱা, বিশ্বাস কৰা সকলৰ কাৰণে নহয়, অবিশ্বাসী সকলৰ কাৰণে চিন হয়; কিন্তু ঐশ্বৰিক ভাবোক্তি প্ৰচাৰ কৰা, বিশ্বাস নকৰা সকলৰ কাৰণে নহয়, বিশ্বাস কৰা সকলৰ বাবেহে হয়।
AYT: Jadi, bahasa-bahasa lidah adalah tanda, bukan untuk orang yang percaya, tetapi untuk orang yang tidak percaya, sedangkan bernubuat adalah tanda, bukan untuk orang yang tidak percaya, tetapi untuk orang yang percaya.
Bengali: অতএব সেই বিশেষ বিশেষ ভাষা বিশ্বাসীদের জন্য নয়, কিন্তু অবিশ্বাসীদেরই জন্য চিহ্নস্বরূপ; কিন্তু ভাববাণী অবিশ্বাসীদের জন্য নয়, কিন্তু বিশ্বাসীদেরই জন্য।
Gujarati: એ માટે ભાષાઓ વિશ્વાસીઓને નહિ, પણ અવિશ્વાસીઓને માટે નિશાનીરૂપ છે. અને પ્રબોધ અવિશ્વાસીઓને નહિ પણ વિશ્વાસીઓને માટે ચિહનરૂપ છે.
Hindi: इसलिए अन्य भाषाएँ विश्वासियों के लिये नहीं, परन्तु अविश्वासियों के लिये चिन्ह हैं, और भविष्यद्वाणी अविश्वासियों के लिये नहीं परन्तु विश्वासियों के लिये चिन्ह हैं।
Kannada: ಆದ್ದರಿಂದ ಅನ್ಯಭಾಷೆಗಳನ್ನಾಡುವುದು ಯೇಸುವನ್ನು ನಂಬದವರಿಗೆ ಸೂಚನೆಯಾಗಿದೆಯೇ ಹೊರತು ಯೇಸುವನ್ನು ನಂಬುವವರಿಗೆ ಸೂಚನೆಯಲ್ಲವೆಂದು ನಾವು ತಿಳಿದುಕೊಳ್ಳಬೇಕು. ಆದರೆ ಪ್ರವಾದನೆಯು ಯೇಸುವನ್ನು ನಂಬದವರಿಗಾಗಿಯಲ್ಲ ನಂಬುವವರಿಗಾಗಿಯೇ ಇದೆ.
Malayalam: അതുകൊണ്ട് അന്യഭാഷകൾ അടയാളമായിരിക്കുന്നത് വിശ്വാസികൾക്കല്ല, അവിശ്വാസികൾക്കത്രേ; പ്രവചനമോ അവിശ്വാസികൾക്കല്ല, വിശ്വാസികൾക്ക് തന്നെ.
Marathi: म्हणून इतर भाषांमध्ये बोलण्याचे दान हे विश्वासणाऱ्यांसाठी नसून अविश्वासणाऱ्यांसाठी चिन्हादाखल आहे.
Odiya: ଏଣୁ ପରଭାଷାରେ କଥା କହିବା ବିଶ୍ୱାସୀମାନଙ୍କ ନିମନ୍ତେ ଚିହ୍ନ ସ୍ୱରୂପ ନୁହେଁ, ମାତ୍ର ଅବିଶ୍ୱାସୀମାନଙ୍କ ନିମନ୍ତେ ଚିହ୍ନ ସ୍ୱରୂପ; ଅନ୍ୟ ପକ୍ଷରେ ଭାବବାଣୀ କହିବା ଅବିଶ୍ୱାସୀମାନଙ୍କ ନିମନ୍ତେ ଚିହ୍ନ ସ୍ୱରୂପ ନୁହେଁ, ମାତ୍ର ବିଶ୍ୱାସୀମାନଙ୍କ ନିମନ୍ତେ ଚିହ୍ନ ସ୍ୱରୂପ ।
Punjabi: ਸੋ ਪਰਾਈ ਭਾਸ਼ਾ ਵਿਸ਼ਵਾਸੀਆਂ ਲਈ ਨਹੀਂ ਸਗੋਂ ਅਵਿਸ਼ਵਾਸੀਆਂ ਦੇ ਲਈ ਇੱਕ ਨਿਸ਼ਾਨੀ ਹਨ, ਪਰ ਭਵਿੱਖਬਾਣੀ ਨਿਹਚਾਹੀਣਾਂ ਲਈ ਨਹੀਂ ਸਗੋਂ ਵਿਸ਼ਵਾਸੀਆਂ ਲਈ ਹੈ ।
Tamil: அப்படியிருக்க, அந்நியமொழிகள் விசுவாசிகளுக்கு அடையாளமாக இல்லாமல், விசுவாசம் இல்லாதவர்களுக்கு அடையாளமாக இருக்கிறது; தீர்க்கதரிசனமோ விசுவாசம் இல்லாதவர்களுக்கு அடையாளமாக இல்லாமல், விசுவாசிகளுக்கு அடையாளமாக இருக்கிறது.
Telugu: కాబట్టి భాషలు విశ్వాసులకు కాదు, అవిశ్వాసులకే సూచన. దేవుడిచ్చిన సందేశాన్ని ప్రకటించడం అవిశ్వాసులకు కాదు, విశ్వాసులకే సూచన.
Urdu: पस बेगाना ज़बानें ईमानदारों के लिए नहीं बल्कि बे'ईमानों के लिए निशान हैं और नबुव्वत बे'ईमानों के लिए नहीं, बल्कि ईमानदारों के लिए निशान है।
NETBible: So then, tongues are a sign not for believers but for unbelievers. Prophecy, however, is not for unbelievers but for believers.
NASB: So then tongues are for a sign, not to those who believe but to unbelievers; but prophecy is for a sign, not to unbelievers but to those who believe.
HCSB: It follows that speaking in other languages is intended as a sign, not to believers but to unbelievers. But prophecy is not for unbelievers but for believers.
LEB: So then, tongues are for a sign not to those who believe, but to unbelievers, but prophecy [is] not for unbelievers, but for those who believe.
NIV: Tongues, then, are a sign, not for believers but for unbelievers; prophecy, however, is for believers, not for unbelievers.
ESV: Thus tongues are a sign not for believers but for unbelievers, while prophecy is a sign not for unbelievers but for believers.
NRSV: Tongues, then, are a sign not for believers but for unbelievers, while prophecy is not for unbelievers but for believers.
REB: Clearly then these “strange tongues” are not intended as a sign for believers, but for unbelievers, whereas prophecy is designed not for unbelievers but for believers.
NKJV: Therefore tongues are for a sign, not to those who believe but to unbelievers; but prophesying is not for unbelievers but for those who believe.
KJV: Wherefore tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not: but prophesying [serveth] not for them that believe not, but for them which believe.
NLT: So you see that speaking in tongues is a sign, not for believers, but for unbelievers; prophecy, however, is for the benefit of believers, not unbelievers.
GNB: So then, the gift of speaking in strange tongues is proof for unbelievers, not for believers, while the gift of proclaiming God's message is proof for believers, not for unbelievers.
ERV: And from this we see that the use of different languages shows how God deals with those who don’t believe, not with those who believe. And prophecy shows how God works through those who believe, not through unbelievers.
EVD: So, {here, different} languages are a proof for people that don’t believe, not for people that believe. And prophecy is for people that believe, not for people that don’t believe.
BBE: For this reason tongues are for a sign, not to those who have faith, but to those who have not: but the prophet’s word is for those who have faith, and not for the rest who have not.
MSG: So where does it get you, all this speaking in tongues no one understands? It doesn't help believers, and it only gives unbelievers something to gawk at. Plain truth-speaking, on the other hand, goes straight to the heart of believers and doesn't get in the way of unbelievers.
Phillips NT: That means that tongues are a sign of God's power, not for those who are unbelievers but for those who already believe. Preaching the word of God, on the other hand, is a sign of God's power to those who do not believe rather than to believers.
CEV: Languages that others don't know may mean something to unbelievers, but not to the Lord's followers. Prophecy, on the other hand, is for followers, not for unbelievers.
CEVUK: Languages that others don't know may mean something to unbelievers, but not to the Lord's followers. Prophecy, on the other hand, is for followers, not for unbelievers.
GWV: So the gift of speaking in other languages is a sign for unbelievers, not for believers. The gift of speaking what God had revealed is a sign for believers, not for unbelievers.
NET [draft] ITL: So then <5620>, tongues <1100> are <1510> a sign <4592> not <3756> for believers <4100> but <235> for unbelievers <571>. Prophecy <4394>, however <1161>, is not <3756> for unbelievers <571> but <235> for believers <4100>.