Assamese: তেনেহলে বিধান ঈশ্বৰৰ প্ৰতিজ্ঞাবোৰৰ বিৰুদ্ধে নেকি? নিশ্চয় এনে নহয়! যদি জীৱন দিব পৰা, এনে এক বিধান থাকিলহেঁতেন, তেনেহলে ধাৰ্মিকতা সঁচাকৈ সেই বিধান পালন কৰাৰ দ্বাৰাই হ’লহেতেন।
AYT: Kalau demikian, apakah Hukum Taurat berlawanan dengan perjanjian Allah? Tentu saja tidak! Sebab, jika Hukum Taurat diberikan untuk dapat memberikan hidup, kebenaran pasti berasal dari Hukum Taurat.
Bengali: তবে নিয়ম কি ঈশ্বরের প্রতিজ্ঞা কলাপের বিরুদ্ধে ? একেবারেই না! ফলে যদি এমন নিয়ম দেওয়া হত, যা জীবন দান করতে পারে, তবে ধার্মিকতা অবশ্য নিয়মমূলক হত।
Gujarati: ત્યારે શું નિયમ ઈશ્વરનાં વચનોથી વિરુધ્ધ છે? કદી નહિ, કેમ કે જીવન આપી શકે એવો કોઈ નિયમ જો આપવામાં આવ્યો હોત, તો નિશ્ચે નિયમથી ન્યાયીપણું મળત.
Hindi: तो क्या व्यवस्था परमेश्वर की प्रतिज्ञाओं के विरोध में है? कदापि नहीं! क्योंकि यदि ऐसी व्यवस्था दी जाती जो जीवन दे सकती, तो सचमुच धार्मिकता व्यवस्था से होती।
Kannada: ಹಾಗಾದರೆ ಮೋಶೆಯ ಧರ್ಮಶಾಸ್ತ್ರವು ದೇವರ ವಾಗ್ದಾನಗಳಿಗೆ ವಿರುದ್ಧವೋ? ಹಾಗೆ ಎಂದಿಗೂ ತಿಳಿದುಕೊಳ್ಳಬಾರದು. ಬದುಕಿಸುವುದಕ್ಕೆ ಶಕ್ತವಾಗಿರುವ ಧರ್ಮಶಾಸ್ತ್ರವು ಕೊಡಲ್ಪಟ್ಟಿದ್ದರೆ ಅದನ್ನು ಅನುಸರಿಸುವುದರ ಮೂಲಕ ನಿಸ್ಸಂದೇಹವಾಗಿ ನೀತಿಯುಂಟಾಗುತ್ತಿತ್ತು.
Malayalam: അതുകൊണ്ട് ന്യായപ്രമാണം ദൈവവാഗ്ദത്തങ്ങൾക്ക് വിരോധമോ? ഒരിക്കലും അല്ല; ജീവിപ്പിപ്പാൻ കഴിയുന്നോരു ന്യായപ്രമാണം നല്കിയിരുന്നു എങ്കിൽ നീതി വാസ്തവമായി ആ ന്യായപ്രമാണത്താൽ വരുമായിരുന്നു.
Marathi: तर काय नियमशास्त्र हे देवाच्या वचनाविरुध्द आहे? कधीच नाही. कारण जीवन देण्यास समर्थ असलेले नियमशास्त्र देण्यात आले असते तर, नीतिमत्व खरोखरच नियमशास्त्राने प्राप्त झाले असते.
Odiya: ତେବେ ମୋଶାଙ୍କ ବ୍ୟବସ୍ଥା କି ଈଶ୍ୱରଙ୍କ ପ୍ରତିଜ୍ଞାସମୂହର ବିରୁଦ୍ଧ ? ତାହା କେବେ ହେଁ ନ ହେଉ; କାରଣ ଯଦି ଜୀବନ ଦେବାକୁ ସମର୍ଥ ଏପରି ମୋଶାଙ୍କ ବ୍ୟବସ୍ଥା ଦିଆଯାଇଥାନ୍ତା, ତେବେ ଧାର୍ମିକତା ପ୍ରକୃତରେ ମୋଶାଙ୍କ ବ୍ୟବସ୍ଥାମୂଳକ ହୁଅନ୍ତା ।
Punjabi: ਫੇਰ ਭਲਾ, ਬਿਵਸਥਾ ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਦੇ ਵਾਇਦਿਆਂ ਦੇ ਵਿਰੁੱਧ ਹੈ ? ਕਦੇ ਨਹੀਂ ਜੇਕਰ ਅਜਿਹੀ ਬਿਵਸਥਾ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਹੋਈ ਹੁੰਦੀ ਜਿਹੜੀ ਜੀਵਨ ਦੇ ਸਕਦੀ ਤਾਂ ਧਾਰਮਿਕਤਾ ਸੱਚੀ ਮੁੱਚੀ ਬਿਵਸਥਾ ਤੋਂ ਪ੍ਰਾਪਤ ਹੁੰਦਾ ।
Tamil: அப்படியென்றால் நியாயப்பிரமாணம் தேவனுடைய வாக்குத்தத்தங்களுக்கு எதிரானதா? இல்லையே; நியாயப்பிரமாணம் உயிரைக் கொடுக்கக்கூடியதாக இருந்திருந்தால், நீதியானது நியாயப்பிரமாணத்தினால் உண்டாயிருக்குமே.
Telugu: ధర్మశాస్త్రం దేవుని వాగ్దానాలకు వ్యతిరేకమా? కానే కాదు. ఒకవేళ ధర్మశాస్త్రం బతికించగలిగేలా ఉంటే, ధర్మశాస్త్రం వల్లనే నీతి కలిగి ఉండేది.
Urdu: पस क्या शरी'अत ख़ुदा के वा'दों के खिलाफ़ है?हरगिज़ नहीं !क्यूंकि अगर कोई एसी शरी'अत दी जाती जो जिंदगी बख्श सकती तो, अलबत्ता रास्तबाजी शारी'अत की वजह से होती|
NETBible: Is the law therefore opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that was able to give life, then righteousness would certainly have come by the law.
NASB: Is the Law then contrary to the promises of God? May it never be! For if a law had been given which was able to impart life, then righteousness would indeed have been based on law.
HCSB: Is the law therefore contrary to God's promises? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that was able to give life, then righteousness would certainly be by the law.
LEB: Therefore [is] the law opposed to the promises of God? May it never be! For if a law had been given that was able to give life, certainly righteousness would have been from the law.
NIV: Is the law, therefore, opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would certainly have come by the law.
ESV: Is the law then contrary to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could give life, then righteousness would indeed be by the law.
NRSV: Is the law then opposed to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could make alive, then righteousness would indeed come through the law.
REB: Does the law, then, contradict the promises? Of course not! If a law had been given which had power to bestow life, then righteousness would indeed have come from keeping the law.
NKJV: Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could have given life, truly righteousness would have been by the law.
KJV: [Is] the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
NLT: Well then, is there a conflict between God’s law and God’s promises? Absolutely not! If the law could have given us new life, we could have been made right with God by obeying it.
GNB: Does this mean that the Law is against God's promises? No, not at all! For if human beings had received a law that could bring life, then everyone could be put right with God by obeying it.
ERV: Does this mean that the law works against God’s promises? Of course not. The law was never God’s way of giving new life to people. If it were, then we could be made right with God by following the law.
EVD: Does this mean that the law is against God’s promises? No! If there was a law that could give life to people, then we could be made right by following law.
BBE: Is the law then against the words of God? in no way; because if there had been a law which was able to give life, truly righteousness would have been by the law.
MSG: If such is the case, is the law, then, an anti-promise, a negation of God's will for us? Not at all. Its purpose was to make obvious to everyone that we are, in ourselves, out of right relationship with God, and therefore to show us the futility of devising some religious system for getting by our own efforts what we can only get by waiting in faith for God to complete his promise. For if any kind of rule-keeping had power to create life in us, we would certainly have gotten it by this time.
Phillips NT: Is the Law then to be looked upon as a contradiction of the promises? Certainly not, for if there could have been a law which gave men spiritual life then that law would have produced righteousness.
CEV: Does the Law disagree with God's promises? No, it doesn't! If any law could give life to us, we could become acceptable to God by obeying that law.
CEVUK: Does the Law disagree with God's promises? No, it doesn't! If any law could give life to us, we could become acceptable to God by obeying that law.
GWV: Does this mean, then, that the laws given to Moses contradict God’s promises? That’s unthinkable! If those laws could give us life, then certainly we would receive God’s approval because we obeyed them.
NET [draft] ITL: Is the law <3551> therefore <3767> opposed <2596> to the promises <1860> of God <2316>? Absolutely <1096> not <3361>! For <1063> if <1487> a law <3551> had been given <1325> that was able <1410> to give life <2227>, then righteousness <1343> would certainly <3689> have come by <1722> the law <3551>.