Assamese: কিন্তু যদি সেই গৰুৱে আগেও খোঁচাৰ অভ্যাস আছে, আৰু সেই কথা গৰাকীয়ে জানিবলৈ পায়ো গৰুটোক সাৱধানে নেৰাখে, তেনেহ’লে তেওঁ সেই গৰুৰ সলনি আন গৰু দি ক্ষতিপূৰণ কৰিব লাগিব, আৰু মৰা গৰুটো তেওঁৰ নিজৰ হ’ব।
AYT: Namun, jika lembu itu sudah dikenal sering menanduk tetapi pemiliknya tidak menjaganya, pemilik lembu itu harus mengganti lembu dengan lembu, dan lembu yang mati menjadi miliknya.
Bengali: কিন্তু এটা যদি জানা যায় যে, সেই গোরুটি আগে থেকে শিং দিয়ে আঘাত করত এবং তার মালিক তাকে সাবধানে রাখেনি, তবে সে গোরুর পরিবর্ত্তে অন্য গোরু দেবে, কিন্ত মৃত গোরুটি তারই হবে।
Gujarati: અથવા બળદના માલિકને જો પહેલેથી જ ખબર હોય કે એ બળદને કેટલાક સમયથી મારવાની ટેવ છે અને એના માલિકે એને કાબૂમાં રાખ્યો ન હોય, તો તેનું નુકસાન ભરપાઈ કરી આપવું. બળદને બદલે બળદ આપવો, અને એ મૃત પશુ પણ તેનું થાય.
Hindi: यदि यह प्रगट हो कि उस बैल की पहले से सींग मारने की आदत पड़ी थी, पर उसके स्वामी ने उसे बाँध नहीं रखा, तो निश्चय यह बैल के बदले बैल भर दे, पर लोथ उसी की ठहरे।
Kannada: ಆದರೆ ಆ ಎತ್ತು ಮೊದಲಿನಿಂದಲೂ ಹಾಯುವಂಥದ್ದೇ ಎಂದು ಅದರ ಯಜಮಾನನಿಗೆ ತಿಳಿದ್ದಿದ್ದರೂ ಅದನ್ನು ಕಟ್ಟಿಹಾಕದೇ ಹೋದದ್ದರಿಂದ ಅವನು ಎತ್ತಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಯಾಗಿ ಎತ್ತನ್ನು ಖಂಡಿತವಾಗಿ ಬದಲು ಕೊಡಬೇಕು. ಆದರೆ ಸತ್ತ ಎತ್ತನ್ನು ತಾನೇ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳಬಹುದು.
Marathi: परंतु तो बैल पूर्वीपासून मारका आहे हे ठाऊक असून मालकाने त्यास बांधून ठेवले नाहीतर त्याने बैलाबद्दल बैल द्यावा व मेलेला बैल त्याचा व्हावा.
Odiya: ମାତ୍ର ଗୋରୁ ପୂର୍ବେ ବିନ୍ଧୁଥିବାର ଜାଣି ଯେବେ ତା'ର ସ୍ୱାମୀ ତାକୁ ସାବଧାନରେ ରଖି ନ ଥାଏ, ତେବେ ସେ ଗୋରୁ ପରିଶୋଧରେ ଗୋରୁ ଅବଶ୍ୟ ଦେବ, ମାତ୍ର ମୃତ ଗୋରୁ ତାହାର ନିଜର ହେବ ।
Punjabi: ਅਥਵਾ ਜੇ ਇਹ ਜਾਣਿਆ ਗਿਆ ਕਿ ਉਹ ਪਿੱਛੇ ਵੀ ਮਾਰ ਖੰਡ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਦੀ ਪਰ ਉਸ ਦੇ ਮਾਲਕ ਨੇ ਉਸ ਨੂੰ ਨਹੀਂ ਸਾਂਭਿਆ ਤਾਂ ਉਹ ਜ਼ਰੂਰ ਘਾਟਾ ਭਰੇ ਅਤੇ ਬਲ਼ਦ ਦੇ ਵੱਟੇ ਬਲ਼ਦ ਦੇਵੇ ਅਤੇ ਉਹ ਲੋਥ ਉਹ ਦੀ ਹੋਵੇਗੀ ।
Tamil: அந்த மாடு முன்பே முட்டுகிற மாடென்று அதின் எஜமான் அறிந்தும், அதைக் கட்டிவைக்காமல் இருந்தால், அவன் மாட்டுக்கு மாட்டைக் கொடுக்கவேண்டும்; செத்ததோ அவனுடையதாக வேண்டும்.
Telugu: అయితే ఆ ఎద్దు ఇతరుల్ని పొడుస్తుంది అని ఇంతకు ముందు దాని యజమానికి తెలిసి కూడా అతడు దాన్ని అదుపు చేయకపోతే వాడు తప్పకుండా ఎద్దుకు బదులు ఎద్దును ఇవ్వాలి, చనిపోయిన ఎద్దు అతనిది అవుతుంది.
NETBible: Or if it is known that the ox had the habit of goring, and its owner did not take the necessary precautions, he must surely pay ox for ox, and the dead animal will become his.
NASB: "Or if it is known that the ox was previously in the habit of goring, yet its owner has not confined it, he shall surely pay ox for ox, and the dead animal shall become his.
HCSB: If, however, it is known that the ox was in the habit of goring, yet its owner has not restrained it, he must compensate fully, ox for ox; the dead animal will become his.
LEB: However, if it was known that the bull had the habit of goring, and its owner didn’t keep it confined, the owner must make up for the loss––bull for bull––and then the dead bull will be his."
NIV: However, if it was known that the bull had the habit of goring, yet the owner did not keep it penned up, the owner must pay, animal for animal, and the dead animal will be his.
ESV: Or if it is known that the ox has been accustomed to gore in the past, and its owner has not kept it in, he shall repay ox for ox, and the dead beast shall be his.
NRSV: But if it was known that the ox was accustomed to gore in the past, and its owner has not restrained it, the owner shall restore ox for ox, but keep the dead animal.
REB: But if it is known that the ox has for some time past been vicious and the owner has not kept it under control, he must make good the loss, ox for ox, but the dead beast is his.
NKJV: "Or if it was known that the ox tended to thrust in time past, and its owner has not kept it confined, he shall surely pay ox for ox, and the dead animal shall be his own.
KJV: Or if it be known that the ox hath used to push in time past, and his owner hath not kept him in; he shall surely pay ox for ox; and the dead shall be his own.
NLT: But if the bull was known from past experience to gore, yet its owner failed to keep it under control, the money will not be divided. The owner of the living bull must pay in full for the dead bull but then gets to keep it.
GNB: But if it was known that the bull had been in the habit of attacking and its owner did not keep it penned up, he must make good the loss by giving the other man a live bull, but he may keep the dead animal.
ERV: But if a man’s bull has hurt other animals in the past, that owner is responsible for his bull. If his bull kills another bull, he is guilty because he allowed the bull to be free. That man must pay bull for bull. He must trade his bull for the bull that was killed.
BBE: But if it is common knowledge that the ox has frequently done such damage in the past, and its owner has not kept it under control, he will have to give ox for ox; and the dead beast will be his.
MSG: But if the ox had a history of goring and the owner knew it and did nothing to guard against it, the owner must pay an ox for an ox but can keep the dead animal.
CEV: If you refuse to fence in a bull that is known to attack others, you must pay for any animal it kills, but the dead animal will belong to you.
CEVUK: If you refuse to fence in a bull that is known to attack others, you must pay for any animal it kills, but the dead animal will belong to you.
GWV: However, if it was known that the bull had the habit of goring, and its owner didn’t keep it confined, the owner must make up for the loss––bull for bull––and then the dead bull will be his."
NET [draft] ITL: Or <0176> if it is known <03045> that <03588> the ox <07794> had the habit of goring <05056>, and its <01931> owner <01167> did not <03808> take <08104> the necessary precautions, he must surely pay <07999> <07999> ox <07794> for <08478> ox <07794>, and the dead <04191> animal will become <01961> his.