Assamese: লেবীয়া পৌৰহিত্যৰ অধীনত লোক সকলে বিধান পালে; এতেকে সেই লেবীয়া পুৰোহিতৰ কার্যৰ দ্বাৰাই যদি পূৰ্ণতা লাভ কৰিব পাৰি, তেনেহলে আন এজন পুৰোহিতৰ প্রয়োজন নহ’লহেঁতেন, যি জন প্রথম লেবীয়া পুৰোহিত হাৰোণৰ ৰীতিৰ নিচিনা নহয়, কিন্তু মল্কিচেদকৰ ৰীতিৰ নিচিনা আছিল।
AYT: Sekarang, seandainya kesempurnaan bisa dicapai melalui keimaman Lewi (yang karenanya, umat Israel memperoleh Hukum Taurat), untuk apa ada imam lain yang harus dibangkitkan menurut aturan Melkisedek, dan bukan imam dari garis keturunan Harun?
Bengali: এখন যদি লেবীয় যাজকত্বের মাধ্যমে পরিপূর্ণতা সম্ভব হতে পারত (সেই যাজকত্বের অধীনেই তো লোকেরা নিয়ম পেয়েছিল) তবে আরো কি প্রয়োজন ছিল যে, মল্কীষেদকের রীতি অনুসারে অন্য যাজক উঠবেন, এবং তাঁকে হারোণের রীতি অনুসারে অভিহিত করা হবে না?
Gujarati: એ માટે જો લેવીના યાજકપણાથી પરિપૂર્ણતા થઈ હોત [કેમ કે તે દ્વારા લોકોને નિયમશાસ્ત્ર મળ્યું હતું] તો હારુનના નિયમ પ્રમાણે ગણાયેલો નહિ, એવો બીજો યાજક મેલ્ખીસેદેકના નિયમ અનુસાર ઉત્પન્ન થાય એની શી અગત્ય હતી?
Hindi: तब यदि लेवीय याजक पद के द्वारा सिद्धि हो सकती है (जिसके सहारे से लोगों को व्यवस्था मिली थी) तो फिर क्या आवश्यकता थी, कि दूसरा याजक मेलिकिसिदक की रीति पर खड़ा हो, और हारून की रीति का न कहलाए?
Kannada: ಇಸ್ರಾಯೇಲರಿಗೆ ಕೊಡಲಾದ ಧರ್ಮಶಾಸ್ತ್ರ ಲೇವಿಯರ ಯಾಜಕತ್ವದ ಮೇಲೆ ಆಧಾರಗೊಂಡಿದೆ. ಲೇವಿಯರ ಈ ಯಾಜಕತ್ವದಿಂದಲೇ ಸಂಪೂರ್ಣ ಸಿದ್ಧಿ ಪ್ರಾಪ್ತವಾಗುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾದರೆ, ಆರೋನನ ಪರಂಪರೆಗೆ ಸೇರದ, ಮೆಲ್ಕಿಜೆದೇಕನ ಪರಂಪರೆಗೆ ಸೇರಿದ ಬೇರೊಬ್ಬ ಯಾಜಕನು ಬರುವುದರ ಅಗತ್ಯವೇನಿತ್ತು?
Malayalam: ലേവീ പൗരോഹിത്യത്താൽ ജനത്തിന് ന്യായപ്രമാണം ലഭിച്ച് സമ്പൂർണ്ണത വന്നെങ്കിൽ, അഹരോന്റെ ക്രമപ്രകാരം എന്നു പറയാതെ മൽക്കീസേദെക്കിന്റെ ക്രമപ്രകാരം വേറൊരു പുരോഹിതൻ വരുവാനുള്ള ആവശ്യം എന്തായിരുന്നു?
Marathi: लेवीय वंशजांच्या याजकीय पद्धतीने लोकांना नियमशास्त्र दिले गेले, पण तशा प्रकारच्या याजकीय पद्धतीने लोक धार्मिकदृष्ट्या परिपूर्ण बनू शकले नसते. म्हणून आणखी एका याजकाच्या येण्याची आवश्यकता होती. तो अहरोनासारखा नसून मलकीसदेकासारखा हवा होता.
Odiya: ଆହୁରି ମଧ୍ୟ, ଯେଉଁ ଲେବୀୟ ଯାଜକତ୍ୱ ଅଧୀନରେ ଲୋକମାନେ ମୋଶାଙ୍କ ବ୍ୟବସ୍ଥା ପ୍ରାପ୍ତ ହେଲେ, ସେହି ଯାଜକତ୍ତ୍ୱ ଦ୍ୱାରା ଯଦି ସିଦ୍ଧି ଲାଭ ହୁଅନ୍ତା, ତାହାହେଲେ ହାରୋଣଙ୍କ ଶ୍ରେଣୀ ଅନୁସାରେ ଗଣିତ ନ ହୋଇ ମଲ୍କୀଷେଦକଙ୍କ ସଦୃଶ ଅନ୍ୟ ଜଣେ ଯାଜକ ଉତ୍ପନ୍ନ ହେବାର ଆଉ କ'ଣ ଆବଶ୍ୟକ ଥିଲା ?
Punjabi: ਸੋ ਜੇ ਲੇਵੀ ਵਾਲੀ ਜਾਜਕਾਈ ਨਾਲ ਜਿਸ ਦੇ ਹੁੰਦਿਆਂ ਕੌਮਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਬਿਵਸਥਾ ਮਿਲੀ ਸੀ ਸੰਪੂਰਨਤਾਈ ਪ੍ਰਾਪਤ ਹੁੰਦੀ, ਤਾਂ ਫਿਰ ਕੀ ਲੋੜ ਸੀ ਜੋ ਮਲਕਿਸਿਦਕ ਦੀ ਪਦਵੀ ਦੇ ਅਨੁਸਾਰ ਕੋਈ ਹੋਰ ਜਾਜਕ ਉੱਠਦਾ ਅਤੇ ਹਾਰੂਨ ਦੀ ਪਦਵੀ ਦੇ ਅਨੁਸਾਰ ਨਾ ਗਿਣਿਆ ਜਾਂਦਾ ?
Tamil: அல்லாமலும், இஸ்ரவேல் மக்கள் லேவி கோத்திர ஆசாரிய முறைமைக்கு உட்பட்டிருந்துதான் நியாயப்பிரமாணத்தைப் பெற்றார்கள்; அந்த ஆசாரியமுறைமையினாலே பூரணப்படுதல் உண்டாயிருக்குமானால், ஆரோனுடைய முறைமையின்படி அழைக்கப்படாமல், மெல்கிசேதேக்குடைய முறைமையின்படி அழைக்கப்பட்ட வேறொரு ஆசாரியர் எழும்பவேண்டியது என்ன?
Telugu: లేవీయులు యాజకులై ఉన్నప్పుడే దేవుడు వారికి ధర్మశాస్త్రాన్ని ఇచ్చాడు. కాబట్టి ఒకవేళ ఆ యాజక వ్యవస్థ వల్లనే పరిపూర్ణత కలిగిందీ అనుకుంటే లేవీయుడైన అహరోను క్రమంలో కాకుండా మెల్కీసెదెకు క్రమంలో వేరే యాజకుడు రావలసిన అవసరమేంటి?
Urdu: अगर लावी की कहानत (जिस पर शरीअत मुन्हसिर थी) कामिलियत पैदा कर सकती तो फिर एक और क़िस्म के इमाम की क्या ज़रूरत होती, उस की जो हारून जैसा न हो बल्कि मलिक-ए-सिद्क़ जैसा?
NETBible: So if perfection had in fact been possible through the Levitical priesthood – for on that basis the people received the law – what further need would there have been for another priest to arise, said to be in the order of Melchizedek and not in Aaron’s order?
NASB: Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the people received the Law), what further need was there for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be designated according to the order of Aaron?
HCSB: If, then, perfection came through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise in the order of Melchizedek, and not to be described as being in the order of Aaron?
LEB: Thus if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood, for on the basis of it the people received the law, what further need [is there] for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek and not said to be according to the order of Aaron?
NIV: If perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the law was given to the people), why was there still need for another priest to come—one in the order of Melchizedek, not in the order of Aaron?
ESV: Now if perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need would there have been for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, rather than one named after the order of Aaron?
NRSV: Now if perfection had been attainable through the levitical priesthood—for the people received the law under this priesthood—what further need would there have been to speak of another priest arising according to the order of Melchizedek, rather than one according to the order of Aaron?
REB: Now if perfection had been attainable through the levitical priesthood (on the basis of which the people were given the law), there would have been no need for another kind of priest to arise, described as being in the order of Melchizedek, instead of in the order of Aaron.
NKJV: Therefore, if perfection were through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be called according to the order of Aaron?
KJV: If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need [was there] that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
NLT: And finally, if the priesthood of Levi could have achieved God’s purposes––and it was that priesthood on which the law was based––why did God need to send a different priest from the line of Melchizedek, instead of from the line of Levi and Aaron?
GNB: It was on the basis of the levitical priesthood that the Law was given to the people of Israel. Now, if the work of the levitical priests had been perfect, there would have been no need for a different kind of priest to appear, one who is in the priestly order of Melchizedek, not of Aaron.
ERV: The people were given the law under the system of priests from the tribe of Levi. But no one could be made spiritually perfect through that system of priests. So there was a need for another priest to come. I mean a priest like Melchizedek, not Aaron.
EVD: People were given the law under the system of priests from the Levi family group. But people could not be made spiritually perfect through that system of priests. So there was a need for another priest to come. I mean a priest that is like Melchizedek, not Aaron.
BBE: Now if it was possible for things to be made complete through the priests of the house of Levi (for the law was given to the people in connection with them), what need was there for another priest who was of the order of Melchizedek and not of the order of Aaron?
MSG: If the priesthood of Levi and Aaron, which provided the framework for the giving of the law, could really make people perfect, there wouldn't have been need for a new priesthood like that of Melchizedek.
Phillips NT: It if were possible to bring men to spiritual maturity through the Levitical priestly system (for that is the system under which the people were given the Law), why does the necessity arise for another priest to make his appearance [after the order of Melchizedek], instead of following the normal priestly calling of Aaron?
CEV: Even though the Law of Moses says that the priests must be descendants of Levi, those priests cannot make anyone perfect. So there needs to be a priest like Melchizedek, rather than one from the priestly family of Aaron.
CEVUK: Even though the Law of Moses says that the priests must be descendants of Levi, those priests cannot make anyone perfect. So there needs to be a priest like Melchizedek, rather than one from the priestly family of Aaron.
GWV: The people established the Levitical priesthood based on instructions they received. If the work of the Levitical priests had been perfect, we wouldn’t need to speak about another kind of priest. However, we speak about another kind of priest, a priest like Melchizedek, not a Levitical priest like Aaron.
NET [draft] ITL: So <3767> if <1487> perfection <5050> had in fact been possible through <1223> the Levitical <3020> priesthood <2420>– for <1063> on <1909> that basis <846> the people <2992> received the law <3549>– what <5101> further <2089> need <5532> would there have been for another <2087> priest <2409> to arise <450>, said <3004> to be in <2596> the order <5010> of Melchizedek <3198> and <2532> not <3756> in <2596> Aaron’s <2> order <5010>?
