Assamese: এতিয়া মই ইয়াকে কওঁ, পূৰ্বতে ঈশ্বৰৰ দ্বাৰাই নিয়মৰ চুক্তি থিৰ কৰা হ’ল আৰু তাৰ চাৰি শ ত্রিশ বছৰৰ পাছত বিধান আহিল। তাতে পূর্বৰ সেই নিয়মৰ চুক্তি প্ৰতিজ্ঞাৰ কৰাৰ দ্বাৰা বাতিল হৈ নাযায়।
AYT: Maksudku, Hukum Taurat yang muncul 430 tahun sesudahnya tidak dapat membatalkan perjanjian yang telah disahkan oleh Allah. Jadi, perjanjian itu tidak bisa ditiadakan.
Bengali: এখন আমি এই বলি, যে চুক্তি ঈশ্বরের থেকে আগেই প্রতিষ্ঠিত হয়েছিল, চারশো ত্রিশ বছর পরে আসা নিয়ম সেই প্রতিজ্ঞাকে উঠিয়ে দিতে পারে না, যা প্রতিজ্ঞাকে বিফল করবে।
Gujarati: હવે આ હું કહું છું કે, જે કરાર ઈશ્વરે ખ્રિસ્તમાં અગાઉથી નક્કી કર્યો હતો તેને ચારસો ત્રીસ વરસ પછી થયેલો નિયમ રદ કરીને તેમનું વચન નકામું કરી શકતો નથી.
Hindi: पर मैं यह कहता हूँ कि जो वाचा परमेश्वर ने पहले से पक्की की थी, उसको व्यवस्था चार सौ तीस बरस के बाद आकर नहीं टाल सकती, कि प्रतिज्ञा व्यर्थ ठहरे। (निर्ग. 12:40)
Kannada: ನಾನು ಹೇಳಬಯಸುವುದೇನೆಂದರೆ, ದೇವರು ಮೊದಲು ಅನುಮೋದಿಸಿದ ಒಡಂಬಡಿಕೆಯನ್ನು, ನಾನೂರ ಮೂವತ್ತು ವರುಷಗಳ ನಂತರ ಬಂದ ಮೋಶೆಯ ಧರ್ಮಶಾಸ್ತ್ರವು ಅದನ್ನು ನಿರರ್ಥಕಗೊಳಿಸಿ, ಆ ವಾಗ್ದಾನವನ್ನು ಬರಿದಾಗಿಮಾಡಲು ಸಾಧ್ಯವಿಲ್ಲ.
Malayalam: ഇപ്പോൾ ഞാൻ പറയുന്നതിന്റെ താല്പര്യമോ: നാനൂറ്റിമുപ്പത് വർഷം കഴിഞ്ഞിട്ടു ഉണ്ടായ ന്യായപ്രമാണം വാഗ്ദത്തത്തെ നീക്കുവാൻ തക്കവണ്ണം ദൈവം മുമ്പ് ഉറപ്പാക്കിയ നിയമത്തെ ദുർബ്ബലമാക്കുന്നില്ല.
Marathi: आणि, मी हे म्हणतो की, देवाने तो करार आधीच स्थापल्यावर चारशे तीस वर्षांनंतर झालेल्या नियमशास्त्रामुळे संपुष्टात येऊन त्यामुळे अभिवचन रद्द करू होत नाही.
Odiya: ମୋହର ଭାବ ଏହି, ଯେଉଁ ନିୟମ ଈଶ୍ୱରଙ୍କ କର୍ତ୍ତୃକ ପୂର୍ବରୁ ସ୍ଥିରୀକୃତ ହୋଇଥିଲା, ଚାରି ଶହ ତିରିଶି ବର୍ଷ ପରେ ଦିଆଯାଇଥିବା ମୋଶାଙ୍କ ବ୍ୟବସ୍ଥା ତାହା ବ୍ୟର୍ଥ କରେ ନାହିଁ, ଯେପରି ତଦ୍ଵାରା ପ୍ରତିଜ୍ଞା ନିଷ୍ଫଳ କରାଯାଏ ।
Punjabi: ਹੁਣ ਮੈਂ ਇਹ ਆਖਦਾ ਹਾਂ ਭਈ ਉਸ ਨੇਮ ਨੂੰ ਜੋ ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਨੇ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਹੀ ਬੰਨ੍ਹਿਆ ਸੀ ਸੋ ਬਿਵਸਥਾ ਜਿਹੜੀ ਉਸ ਤੋਂ ਚਾਰ ਸੌ ਤੀਹ ਸਾਲਾਂ ਦੇ ਪਿੱਛੋਂ ਆਈ ਉਸ ਨੇਮ ਨੂੰ ਨਹੀਂ ਟਾਲ ਸਕਦੀ ਕਿ ਉਹ ਬਚਨ ਵਿਅਰਥ ਹੋ ਜਾਵੇ ।
Tamil: ஆகவே, நான் சொல்லுகிறது என்னவென்றால், கிறிஸ்துவை முன்னிட்டு தேவனால் முன்னமே உறுதிப்பண்ணப்பட்ட உடன்படிக்கையை நானூற்றுமுப்பது வருடங்களுக்குப்பின்பு உண்டான நியாயப்பிரமாணமானது, வாக்குத்தத்தத்தைப் பயனற்றதாக்காது.
Telugu: నేను చెప్పేది ఏంటంటే, 430 సంవత్సరాలైన తరువాత వచ్చిన ధర్మశాస్త్రం, దేవుడు ముందుగానే స్థిరపరచిన నిబంధనను కొట్టివేయదు. దాని వాగ్దానాన్ని వ్యర్థం చేయదు.
Urdu: मेरा ये मतलब है :जिस 'अहद की खुदा ने पहले से तसदीक़ की थी,उसको शरी'अत चार सौ तीस बरस के बा'द आकर बातिल नहीं कर सकती कि वो वा'दा लाहासिल हो|
NETBible: What I am saying is this: The law that came four hundred thirty years later does not cancel a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to invalidate the promise.
NASB: What I am saying is this: the Law, which came four hundred and thirty years later, does not invalidate a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to nullify the promise.
HCSB: And I say this: the law, which came 430 years later, does not revoke a covenant that was previously ratified by God, so as to cancel the promise.
LEB: Now I am saying this: the law, that came after four hundred and thirty years, does not revoke a covenant previously ratified by God, in order to nullify the promise.
NIV: What I mean is this: The law, introduced 430 years later, does not set aside the covenant previously established by God and thus do away with the promise.
ESV: This is what I mean: the law, which came 430 years afterward, does not annul a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to make the promise void.
NRSV: My point is this: the law, which came four hundred thirty years later, does not annul a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to nullify the promise.
REB: My point is this: a testament, or covenant, had already been validated by God; a law made four hundred and thirty years later cannot invalidate it and so render its promises ineffective.
NKJV: And this I say, that the law, which was four hundred and thirty years later, cannot annul the covenant that was confirmed before by God in Christ, that it should make the promise of no effect.
KJV: And this I say, [that] the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
NLT: This is what I am trying to say: The agreement God made with Abraham could not be canceled 430 years later when God gave the law to Moses. God would be breaking his promise.
GNB: What I mean is that God made a covenant with Abraham and promised to keep it. The Law, which was given four hundred and thirty years later, cannot break that covenant and cancel God's promise.
ERV: This is what I mean: The agreement that God gave to Abraham was made official long before the law came. The law came 430 years later. So the law could not take away the agreement and change God’s promise.
EVD: This is what I mean: The agreement {that God gave to Abraham} was made official long before the law came. The law came 430 years later. So the law could not take away the agreement and change God’s promise.
BBE: Now this I say: The law, which came four hundred and thirty years after, does not put an end to the agreement made before by God, so as to make the undertaking without effect.
MSG: This is the way I interpret this: A will, earlier ratified by God, is not annulled by an addendum attached 430 years later, thereby negating the promise of the will.
Phillips NT: I say then that the Law, which came into existence four hundred and thirty years later, cannot render null and void the original "contract" which God had made, and thus rob the promise of its value.
CEV: What I am saying is that the Law cannot change or cancel God's promise that was made 430 years before the Law was given.
CEVUK: What I am saying is that the Law cannot change or cancel God's promise that was made 430 years before the Law was given.
GWV: This is what I mean: The laws given to Moses 430 years after God had already put his promise to Abraham into effect didn’t cancel the promise to Abraham.
NET [draft] ITL: What I am saying <3004> is this <5124>: The law <3551> that came <1096> four hundred <5071> thirty <5144> years <2094> later <3326> does <208> not <3756> cancel <208> a covenant <1242> previously ratified <4300> by <5259> God <2316>, so as <1519> to <2673> invalidate the promise <1860>.